Hier sind die bisherigen Projektergebnisse!

Meilenstein 3.1.1 - Leitfaden zur Datengewinnung

Im Rahmen von DACE haben wir einen Leitfaden zur Datengewinnung in der Kreislaufwirtschaft erarbeitet. Das Whitepaper behandelt alle Themen, die für eine erfolgreiche Datengewinnung notwendig sind, und dient als einführende Literatur.

 

Download: Leitfaden zur Dategewinnung

Meilenstein 3.2 - Bewertungsrahmen Kurzfassung

Das Meilensteindokument 3.2 entwickelt einen wissenschaftlich fundierten und praxisnahen Bewertungsrahmen, mit dem die Zirkularität von Produkten, Unternehmen und ganzen Wirtschaftssystemen systematisch und vergleichbar erfasst werden kann. Es kombiniert theoretische Prinzipien der Kreislaufwirtschaft mit konkreten Methoden und Indikatoren und wendet diese auf drei Ebenen an (Produkt, Unternehmen, Gesamtwirtschaft), einschließlich Fallstudien und der Verknüpfung mit politischen Rahmenbedingungen. Der zentrale Mehrwert liegt in einem integrierten, anwendbaren Indikatorensystem samt Umsetzungsplan, das ökologische, ökonomische und soziale Aspekte berücksichtigt und Akteuren aus Wirtschaft, Politik und Forschung als Entscheidungs- und Steuerungsinstrument dient.

 

Download: Bewertungsrahmen - Kurzfassung

This spreadsheet contains the complete list of circularity indicators and their assignment to EDA (ecodesign approaches), including each indicator’s source, DOI identification, description, and calculation formula. It also includes ISO circularity indicators. The spreadsheet enables comparison between the current status of product design and potential circularity improvement scenarios.

DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16743470

This study investigates which key performance indicators (KPIs) are used by companies to measure and manage circular economy (CE), and to what extent these KPIs align with the requirements of mandatory and voluntary external reporting frameworks. The research combines a theoretical review with an online survey and interviews conducted with German companies. The findings indicate that many companies are still in the early stages of their transition to CE, with a primary focus on lower-level circular strategies such as recycling. Furthermore, external reporting demands substantial effort and resources, often without directly supporting the internal management of CE.

DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16742719

Reference List of Meso-Level Circular Economy Indicators

The objetive of this study is to provide a list of relevant indicators for measuring the performance of Eco-Industrial Parks (meso-level) across their constituint parts, considering different production stages, from by-product sharing to services sharing

The Scopus and Google Scholar databases were used for the literature review on performance measurement in Eco-Industrial Parks. Although the literature review was not exhaustive, approximately 50 scientific articles on the topic were consulted to arrive at a smaller list of key references. Subsequently, a generic representation of the production model of Eco-Industrial Parks was constructed, including its crucial processing stages and important indicators, based on the authors’ interpretation and perspective.

DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18187483

Reference List of Micro-Level Circular Economy Indicators

The objective of this study is to provide a list of relevant indicators for measuring the performance of companies in circular economy across their entire value chain, considering different production stages, from upstream to downstream.

The steps for developing this spreadsheet began with a bibliographical review aimed at selecting key references, i.e., those widely cited by authors and companies to date. Next, these references were analyzed, and their indicators were noted in the spreadsheet in the form of specific metrics, with each indicator potentially having multiple metrics. Each metric was then linked to the corresponding stage of the company's value chain. Finally, the circular economy strategy associated with each indicator was also documented, using as references the strategies proposed by Potting et al. (2017), or 9Rs strategies.

DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15838611